There is a moment I see happen with almost every student I work with. They show me their photos, I can see the eye they have, the instinct that is already there — and then they say something like, my work is good, I guess, when I look at it. But then I go online and I just don’t know.
I had this exact conversation recently. A student with a genuinely strong eye, someone whose compositions already showed real intention, told me she wasn’t sure her work was good enough. I didn’t argue with her. Instead I pulled up one of my own photos — didn’t tell her it was mine — and asked her what she thought.
She loved it. She said it was amazing. She listed things she noticed, things she responded to emotionally. She used words like powerful and intentional.
Then I told her it was mine. And that I kind of hate it. That every time I look at it I can see at least five things I would do differently now.
She looked at me like I was a little bit out of my mind.
That is the thing about progress in photography. The better your eye gets, the harder you are on yourself. The gap between what you can see and what you can currently execute becomes painfully visible. Most photographers read that gap as failure. It is actually the opposite — it means your eye is running ahead of your hands, and your hands will catch up. That gap is not a problem. It is the engine.
But comparison to other people’s work short-circuits that process entirely. When you are measuring yourself against someone else, you are not looking at their gap. You are only seeing their output — usually their best output, their most polished and edited and carefully selected work. Measuring your raw process against someone else’s highlight reel is not a fair fight, and it tells you nothing true about where you are.
Why photographers compare in the first place
Comparison is not a character flaw. It is what happens when you care deeply about something and don’t yet have a reliable internal compass for it. When you are new to photography — or even when you are intermediate and hitting a wall — you look outward because you genuinely don’t know how to look inward yet. Other people’s work becomes the only available ruler.
The problem is that ruler was never built for you. It was built for someone else’s journey, someone else’s gear, someone else’s ten thousand hours. Using it to measure your own progress is like trying to track your running pace using someone else’s stride length. The numbers will never add up correctly, and you will always come out behind.
I have been shooting for 30 years. I started in film. I have worked with national brands, published a book, and spent two decades running a working portrait studio. And I still catch myself looking at another photographer’s work and feeling the familiar pull of mine doesn’t look like that. It does not go away entirely. What changes is that you learn to recognize it for what it is — noise — and return to your own work.
What actually tells you something useful
The most honest measure of progress is your own archive. Not Instagram. Not anyone else’s portfolio. Your own older work, looked at with fresh and unhurried eyes.
Pull up photos from six months ago. A year ago. Two years ago if you have them. Sit with them. Not to cringe at what you didn’t know then, and not to feel nostalgic either — just to look honestly. Most photographers are genuinely surprised by how much has shifted without them noticing it was happening. The exposures are cleaner. The framing is more deliberate. The moments they chose to capture have more intention behind them. Progress in photography is often invisible while it is happening and only becomes visible in retrospect.
Beyond the archive, pay attention to how effort feels. This is something I track in my own work more than anything else. Right now I am teaching myself macro photography, which is a completely different discipline from what I have spent three decades doing. Macro requires a different relationship with the lens, different patience, a different way of seeing altogether. The way I know I am improving is not by comparing my macro shots to someone else’s — it is by noticing how long it takes me to get where I want to be. Early on, every shot felt like a negotiation. Now I get there faster, and with less frustration. That shift in effort — the way something that used to be hard starts to feel more natural — is real data. It is worth paying attention to.
The gap between your eye and your hands
One of the most disorienting things that happens as you develop as a photographer is that your eye improves faster than your technical ability. You start seeing light differently before you know how to expose for it. You recognize a strong composition before you can consistently reproduce one. You know what you want an image to feel like before you have the skills to make it feel that way.
This gap is uncomfortable. It is supposed to be. It means you are growing.
The mistake is interpreting that discomfort as evidence that you are not good enough, when it is actually evidence that your vision is expanding. The technical skills catch up. They always do, if you keep shooting. But if you spend that uncomfortable middle period measuring yourself against photographers who are five or ten or twenty years further along, you will talk yourself out of the process before the skills have a chance to arrive.
My student — the one who loved my photo before she knew it was mine — needed to understand that what she was seeing in my work was thirty years of that exact gap closing over and over again. She is not behind. She is in the middle of it, which is exactly where she should be.
What clients actually see
Here is the part that shifted something for her that day. She had been listing everything she thought was wrong with my photo — the things I myself would change if I could go back. And I pointed out that she hadn’t seen any of those things when she thought the photo belonged to someone else. She had seen an image that moved her.
Clients are not photographers. They are not evaluating your work against a technical standard or comparing it to someone else’s portfolio in real time. They are looking for a memory. A feeling. A moment that meant something, captured in a way that lets them hold onto it. When you are chasing perfection against an imaginary benchmark set by photographers whose work you admire, you are solving a problem your clients do not have.
That does not mean you stop growing or stop caring about craft. It means you stop using the wrong ruler to measure whether your work has value. Those are two very different things.
How to build your own measuring system
If comparison is the wrong tool, what do you use instead? Here is what I suggest to my students and what I come back to in my own practice.
Keep a monthly favorites folder. At the end of each month, pull out three to five images you made that you actually like — not the technically perfect ones necessarily, but the ones that did what you wanted them to do. Don’t overthink it. Just save them somewhere. Over time that folder becomes a record of your own aesthetic developing, your own instincts sharpening. It is yours. Nobody else’s work is in it.
Write one sentence about what you were trying to do. This sounds small but it matters. When you look back at a photo six months from now and you have a note that says I was trying to capture how still the light felt that morning, you can actually evaluate whether you got there. Without that note, you are just looking at a picture. With it, you are tracking intention.
Shoot the same subject repeatedly over time. A park near your house. Your kitchen table in morning light. Your dog. Whatever it is, returning to the same subject over months gives you a direct record of how your eye and your technical skills are evolving. The subject stays constant. Your approach to it changes. That change is your progress, documented.
Ask one trusted person, not the internet. Social media feedback is almost useless for measuring growth because it measures engagement, not craft. Find one person — a mentor, a photographer further along than you, someone whose eye you trust — and ask them periodically to look at your work and tell you honestly what they see improving. That conversation is worth more than a thousand likes.
Try this right now
Go back to photos you took at least six months ago — a full year is even better. Pick one you remember feeling proud of at the time. Look at it now. Ask yourself two questions: what did I do well here that I wasn’t even fully conscious of doing? And what would I do differently now that I know more?
Write both answers down. The first one shows you what was already working in your instincts. The second one shows you exactly how far you have come. Keep that note somewhere you can find it, and do this again in six months. That record, built over time, is the only progress measurement that actually belongs to you.
When you genuinely can’t tell
Sometimes you are too close to your own work to see it clearly. This happens to every photographer — the more you stare at your own images, the less you can evaluate them with any objectivity. When that happens, the answer is not to go look at other people’s work. The answer is outside perspective from someone who knows what they are looking at.
This is a lot of what mentoring is for. Not to be told whether your photos are good or bad, but to have someone experienced reflect back what they actually see — the strengths you can not see because you are inside the work, and the specific things worth developing next. I work with photographers one on one, and this is one of the most common things we end up doing in early sessions: untangling what a student actually knows from what they think they don’t know. The gap is almost always smaller than they believe.
If you want to explore mentoring, you can find more information at Savvy Shutterbug mentoring. And if you are looking for a free place to start, the Gentle Photography Reset Guide is built around slowing down and reconnecting with your own work — exactly the reset this kind of comparison spiral calls for.
Frequently asked questions
How do I know if I am actually improving at photography?
The most reliable sign is that things that used to be hard start to feel more natural. Your eye gets faster. You make decisions at the camera more intuitively. You look back at work from six months or a year ago and can see clearly what you would do differently. If you are noticing those shifts, you are improving — even if the work does not yet look the way you want it to.
Is it okay to look at other photographers’ work for inspiration?
Yes — there is a difference between looking at other work for inspiration or education and using it as a measuring stick for your own worth. Study other photographers’ work to learn. Admire it. Be moved by it. Just don’t hand it the job of telling you whether your own work has value. That job belongs to your own developing eye and to people who know your work well.
What should I do when I feel like I’ve stopped improving?
Plateaus are real and they are normal — there is a whole post on this coming later in November. The short answer is: change one variable. Shoot a subject you have never shot before. Restrict yourself to one focal length for a month. Try something that makes you uncomfortable technically. Plateaus usually mean your current practice has gotten too comfortable, not that you have hit a ceiling.
Related posts
What to Do When You Feel Like Your Photos Aren’t Good Enough
The Systems That Help Me Avoid Burnout
Year-End Reflection: How to Set Photography Goals